RAD Studio XE5 is now GA - Delphi Overview page - http://embt.co/DelphiXE5

RAD Studio XE5 is now GA - Delphi Overview page - http://embt.co/DelphiXE5
http://embt.co/DelphiXE5

Comments

  1. Awesome, Android! I'm totally getting this.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm surprised.  By now I shouldn't be, but I am still surprised.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I forgot to say that I was not positively surprised.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Oh btw - I will actually be in Oslo for the launch, lee clark - with my team mates.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Great,  Lars Fosdal good to hear that looking foreward to meeting you in person sir.

    ReplyDelete
  6. On a note, I still think Embarcadero should include mobile development with Delphi by default, rather than offer it as an add-on pack. But that's just my opinion. I always get RAD Studio though, so it doesn't really matter to me.
     I think I might actually get Enterprise rather than Professional this time, not sure yet, I'll have to give the feature matrix another look.

    EDIT: I'm going to give the demo a try. I'm certainly looking forward to the tech preview event in Belgium next week.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Lars Fosdal Surprised by what? I'm impressed that finding the info I want seems to get more difficult, rather than less. And on the sales side, am I the only one who thinks it's silly to charge for media when a customer has paid a couple of grand for product?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Bill Meyer What are you refering to, with finding information more difficult? It looks pretty clean and clear to me (though it might be nice to link to the feature matrix in there somewhere, at least more clearly than in the links at the bottom of the page). As for the pricing, Pretty much what I expect from Embarcadero. I suppose it's somewhat different for me because I can still rely on academic pricing. If there's anything Embarcadero really got right, it's the academic licenses.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Media costs money to manufacture and store, and the world is mostly online.  I'm not surprised by media charges.  I am mostly surprised about EMBT still repeating the same mistakes and expecting a different result.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Bill Meyer off the record (if off the record is posting this on G+) yes I agree with you about the media.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Lars Fosdal would be great to have a chat when we meet in Olso.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Lars Fosdal Media costs very little these days, and if they pay $20 for a DVD (pretty insane, IMHO), including it with a $2k-$4K product doesn't seem unreasonable.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Lars Fosdal The fact does indeed remain that for example MS has tons of traction due to their free Express editions. I do understand that EMBT doesn't really believe in that, changing models like that isn't an easy change to make. The starter edition was a step in the right direction, but I think not quite enough to actually motive people to choose Delphi over another language, is they have no experience with Delphi or programming in general. A free edition with the same limitations and a closed source VCL/RTL/FMX might come a long way. I really love Delphi as a language though, it's a great language and I really hope it'll gain more traction over the next few years. The iOS/Android support should certainly make it a very interesting option for developers.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Lars Fosdal As to the mistakes, I agree, but I guess the lesson to us is that it seems to be taking them where they want to go. Or if it's not, then the management is really much worse than I would like to think, since little has changed in the approach for quite a while.

    ReplyDelete
  15. lee clark I'm sort of surprised that Embarcadero is still offering media to begin with. Given that a lot of development tools can only be obtained through downloads these days.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Online shop prices: 
    https://store.embarcadero.com/542/purl-dbanner

    One thing is certain: Paying for SA is money saved - well, at least if you prefer upgrading every time, like me.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Frédéric Hannes I suspect some corporate accounts may require it. But I think it just looks petty.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Lars Fosdal I sorta got the update often notion out of my head after suffering through a lot of turbulence in some third party components. Stability is a Good Thing. ;)

    ReplyDelete
  19. Lars Fosdal Frédéric Hannes Bill Meyer  Just to run something passed you, in Africa we are giving away Delphi 2010 Pro Academic, would this be a step in the rite direction for other regions?

    ReplyDelete
  20. Bill Meyer True, it should probably just be included with the licenses for free, given that they're already as expensive as they are.

    ReplyDelete
  21. lee clark Certainly! I study computer science at the KULeuven university in Belgium. We use pretty much Java for everything. Most people don't even know what Delphi is anymore at my age. I think it's very important to motivate young people to get into Delphi development. It would greatly benefit the language and demand for it in the future.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Bill Meyer I agree that we should get free media.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Lars Fosdal You mean it's not ready?

    ReplyDelete
  24. Phillip Woon - Were the XE, XE2, XE3 and XE4 ready when they were released?

    ReplyDelete
  25. Lars Fosdal I usually fully adopt a Delphi release only after about 6 months, which means that there's usually 1 or 2 update packs already available.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Frédéric Hannes - We generally do the same for production code.

    ReplyDelete
  27. lee clark A huge issue I think, is that education, at least over here in Belgium as far as I'm aware, does not adopt Delphi anymore. Students would have to sort of get around to using it by themselves, like I did. But the choice between Delphi and Java or .NET for example is usually made pretty quickly, if Delphi is even considered. Despite the great academic pricing, the free languages will usually/always win out, for people who have no experience with Delphi, and as such, don't know that the academic price, can be justified.

    It might be a good idea to promote Delphi more through education related events. For example, I pretty much every year participate in a national programming contest here in Belgium, which is organized by the academic community and held at a university/college each year. They offer a variety of languages which you can use, .NET languages, Java, Ruby even languages like Prolog and Haskell. (All of which I have personally been taught at some point at the university) Every time I participate, I ask if they are adopting Delphi. Every time the answer is that I should use FPC, because they won't be supporting Delphi. At the event, there's always some representative from Microsoft as well, promoting .NET development. I think supporting events like this might also be a good way of bringing Delphi closer to new developers.

    That's just view on the issue anyway. I hope it might offer a useful perspective.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Delphi is dead!!! Oh wait, only the EMBT homepage currently is ... :P

    ReplyDelete
  29. Well, no software is really ready when it get's released.  That reminds me of a saying:

    I don't usually test my code, but when I do, I do it in production.

    ReplyDelete
  30. I completely understand what Lars Fosdal is saying here and why :-)

    ReplyDelete
  31. lee clark I doubt that it could hurt, but I know that in California (where I used to reside) many schools actively preach against any Pascal or derivative. In that environment, it's probably just a waste of time.

    ReplyDelete
  32. I got my email to download XE5.  When I was in college (in the 80's), we did all our programming in Pascal .

    ReplyDelete
  33. I am downloading now, if only to see if the problems I encountered with the last beta are fixed >_<

    ReplyDelete
  34. I wasn't on the beta, but I'm all over the trial.  The emulator experience is a bit wonky. Tomorrow I'll try again on a real Nexus 7 tablet.

    https://forums.embarcadero.com/thread.jspa?messageID=595226&#595226

    ReplyDelete
  35. The emulator is the same one you use on eclipse/android studio - SLOW

    ReplyDelete
  36. Real hardware is an absolute must, unless you have extraordinary patience.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Good grief yes - in a way its a shame that the output is native arm code, under eclipse or android studio you could at least target the atom versions of android and use the intel hardware acceleration to make things halfway bearable.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment