No C++ Builder, not even behind VI/VIM.

-
No C++ Builder, not even behind VI/VIM.

Via Joe C. Hecht​

Originally shared by Linux Inside

14 Best IDEs for C++ Programming or Source Code Editors on Linux

#linux #sysadmin #tecmint #programming #coding  
http://www.tecmint.com/best-linux-ide-editors-source-code-editors

Comments

  1. Joe C. HechtJuly 2, 2016 at 10:27 AM

    I agree with Jeroen Wiert Pluimers - Where is the RAD Studio IDE?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Palle MeinertJuly 2, 2016 at 10:58 AM

    The title says "on Linux"!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Joe C. HechtJuly 2, 2016 at 11:06 AM

    Palle Meinert I forget.. I'm on Linux, but between the VM windows and the VNC Windows, I can't tell what machine I am on half the time,. oops... I said Windows.. Twice.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Knut ReckwegJuly 2, 2016 at 11:30 AM

    If Borland/Embarcadero/Codegear is pro in one single discipline, it is betting on the wrong OS.
    They did it with
    Kylix (a little bit to early, a bit to half-hearted)
    Web/HTML5 Builder (seems it was seen as the unloved cousin of Delphi)
    iOS (to US-centric, Android market was way higher worldwide)
    MacOS (Hype is over - also seen worldwide, but could count as the only win)
    now Linux Server (much to late)

    Embarcadero Technologies should team up with JetBrains so Delphi (for me the only Embarcadero product worth mentioning, since I don't use C++ Builder) maybe could survive the bleed out. But it sadly is no longer in Embarcaderos own hands.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Phillip WoonJuly 2, 2016 at 12:57 PM

    Linux is going to be where it's at soon. There seem to be a crack in the Windows armor. My son (14) will be taking a class for Linux this summer, and right after we're going to install Linux on two spare machines we have lying around. If it weren't for my work, I wouldn't need Windows at all.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Jeroen Wiert PluimersJuly 3, 2016 at 12:36 AM

    So why can Xamarin and RemObjects do it and the C++ Builder R&D team can't?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Palle MeinertJuly 3, 2016 at 3:22 AM

    Javier Hernández Wish they start take advantage of LLVM's features for that. At least on C++ side, which is incredible slow and poor to do any code-insight and refactoring compared to almost everything else on the market.

    ReplyDelete
  8. David MillingtonJuly 4, 2016 at 3:39 AM

    Jeroen Wiert Pluimers These are IDEs that run on Linux, which C++Builder doesn't :)

    ReplyDelete
  9. Jeroen Wiert PluimersJuly 4, 2016 at 4:51 AM

    David Millington hence the question about Xamarin and RemObjects.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Cristian PețaJuly 4, 2016 at 11:21 AM

    Atanas Popov has said something about modernizing the IDE....

    ReplyDelete
  11. Horácio FilhoJuly 4, 2016 at 10:41 PM

    Cristian Peța I think what he meant by modernizing the IDE is about UI/UX experience. The IDE relies upon many tools, bring it to another platform is pretty difficult, or even impossible today.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Warren PostmaJuly 6, 2016 at 10:23 AM

    CLion is pretty nice for C and C++ developers.

    I would use NetBeans on Linux, it's a competent C/C++ IDE.

    Code::Blocks is not very good.  Geany is actually better, if you want a nice way to write a GTK or GTK+ app in C++ on Linux.

    If you want to write a QT app, then QtCreator is pretty good.

    C++ Builder will NEVER run on Linux.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment