Finding of today - List of Pascal/Delphi open source projects hosted on github.com by *contribution rates*. In other words, it answers this question - which of the open source Pascal/Delphi projects hosted on github get updates recently?
Finding of today - List of Pascal/Delphi open source projects hosted on github.com by *contribution rates*. In other words, it answers this question - which of the open source Pascal/Delphi projects hosted on github get updates recently?
http://www.krihelinator.xyz/repositories/Pascal
http://www.krihelinator.xyz/repositories/Pascal
/sub
ReplyDeleteThat list needs a lot more repositories...
ReplyDeleteIt only lists projects on GitHub (afais) so many projects that are active are not listed (such as Spring4D that only has a repository copy on GitHub for Delphinus). Also currently considering moving to GitLab since their offer is way more attractive to my needs than the two others. GitHub does not offer free private repos and Bitbucket limites them to 5 contributors account wide. On GitLab you can have unlimited private repos and contributors.
ReplyDeleteStefan Glienke I forgot to mention that it's for github only. Yes, it doesn't include projects from other hostings, and such a consolidated list is what I wanted for a long time, long before beginend.net - begin end - Object Pascal and Delphi News is created :) And that's why I have suggested Eric Grange to add such features to beginend.net
ReplyDeleteSomeone made a list some while ago but it does not give any information about how active the project is - https://delphi.zeef.com
ReplyDeleteEdwin Yip how do you get an entry on the list? Please add MARS-Curiosity, TFrameStand and SDriver from my github account ( github.com/andrea-magni/ )
ReplyDeleteAndrea Magni Sorry but I'm not the author of that list :) If I understanding it correctly, it analyzes the github data via github API, but not ordered manually.
ReplyDeleteAndrea Magni I guess youre out ;)
ReplyDeleteFrom http://www.krihelinator.xyz/about:
"During the development of this project I found out that people use github as a backup service, automating hundreds of commits per week. Therefor, to filter these projects out, only projects with more than one author enters the Krihelinator DB."
Stefan Glienke Great! Quite a stupid metric in my opinion...
ReplyDeleteNow that I have read how the score is determined I could not disagree more. Number of authors has a 20 multiplier (!) so if 2 authors makes 2 commits (1 each) they would gain 42 points. A single author should do 22 commits to reach the same score. And goes even bad about pull requests. And worse again with the fact they count issues in the score.
ReplyDeleteIf the intent is not to have false data, it is not achieved this way.
Andrea Magni Yes, I noticed this right away - it rewards projects where everyone and their dog commits stuff with tons of issues over an active small team project where everything works (or at least nobody reports the bugs ^^).
ReplyDeleteIt's like paying devs per line of code and Q&A by issues fixed -.-
Nice idea, if the metric could be set to something more valid as Stefan and Andrea indicate. Be nice to have it across a few different repository types.
ReplyDeleteThis is a generic problem with all kinds of ratings. No way to do it unbiased. At least without a state budget. The disappointing fact is that commercialism hinges on such folly.
ReplyDeleteNot really worth getting worked up by this. Feel free to ignore this useless information and continue using your brains as before.
ReplyDeleteHey, my account has two entries on that list. :)
ReplyDelete